The road to city status in Essex: From ‘dull towns’ to economic hubs in the East of England
How Chelmsford, Colchester and Southend have campaigned for city status and what it means for local residents.
Despite having a population of 1.8million people and being the home to several large settlements, Essex was, until a decade ago, a ‘cityless’ county.
Now it boasts two official cities – Chelmsford since 2012 and Southend since earlier this year.
Meanwhile, debate continues over whether Colchester should receive the same elevation or whether it has actually been a city all along.
Here is a look at the stories behind the city status campaigns launched in each location.
CHELMSFORD
As a part of the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee in 2012, the county town of Chelmsford emerged victorious in the three-way race for city status, surprising many.
The Sunday Telegraph columnist Simon Heffer, who was educated at Chelmsford’s King Edward VI Grammar School, said he was “bemused” by the administrative change.
But one man who might have been even more surprised by the choice if he were still alive is Charles Dickens.
The Victorian author, who published notable works such as ‘Oliver Twist’ and ‘A Christmas Carole’, described Chelmsford as “the dullest and most stupid spot” on Earth after stopping off at the Essex town in 1835.
Chelmsford has been an admittedly small and somewhat uneventful place throughout much of its history.
However, it somehow defeated two larger county contenders in obtaining city status after Southend and Colchester were overlooked in 2012.
And much has changed in Chelmsford since Dickens’ visit.
In fact, much has changed in Chelmsford since 2012.
JUST IN: Brentwood's ambitious plans to emulate Chelmsford's Bond Street as council buys the Baytree Centre
The city has expanded throughout the last 10-years and continues to position itself as a regional economic hub.
The most recent estimates put Chelmsford’s overall population at 121,556, up from 110,507 in the 2011 Census.
Chelmsford also pipped Cambridge and several other places to the post as the number one place to live in the East of England back in 2018, according to the Sunday Times’ guide.
The expansion of Chelmsford has also put pressure on the local two-platform train station.
The station, which is on average just 42 minutes away from Liverpool Street, was opened in 1842 but has been forced to cater for an ever-increasing number of commuters.
Despite taking a hit over the course of the pandemic, Chelmsford was one of the busiest stations in Great Britain outside of London in 2020/21, ranking in 17th place with more than 1.7million entries and exits.
However, there are plans for Chelmsford to welcome a second train station in 2025 when the Beaulieu-based station is expected to be completed.
Another significant change in Chelmsford came in September 2016 when the £120million Bond Street development was completed.
The retail and leisure centre, which replaced what was once an ugly Chelmsford car park, had been in the pipeline since the turn of the century.
However, Chelmsford City Council leader Stephen Robinson suggested city status had an impact on the Bond Street development.
Mr Robinson, who was first elected to the council in 2019, said: “City status persuaded the developer of the Bond Street shopping centre that the council was serious about promoting and developing Chelmsford.”
The Liberal Democrat Councillor went on to claim that the Bond Street development, including Everyman Cinema and John Lewis, had helped make Essex’s first city flourish before COVID-19 reached British shores.
“Pre-pandemic,” Cllr Robinson explained, “the Chelmsford city centre was clearly thriving and busier than any other ‘high street’ in Essex.”
When asked what had been the main benefits of city status, he added: “It’s mainly about raising the profile of Chelmsford and ‘putting it on the map’.
“But we wouldn’t have got city status if there hadn’t [have] been ambition and a clear direction of travel.”
Cllr Robinson’s comments have also been echoed by Chelmsford’s Conservative MP Vicky Ford.
Ms Ford, who succeeded veteran Tory MP Simon Burns in 2017, said: “I am told by those who were working on the city status bid that it had a huge amount of support from residents at the time, and lifted confidence.
“It also played a big part in encouraging John Lewis to locate a store in Chelmsford which then attracted other shops, bars and restaurants into the City.
“This has also made the city a more attractive place for businesses to locate jobs.
“New developments have also brought significant investment in infrastructure.”
However, the Foreign Office Minister was keen to stress the need for greater investment to match Chelmsford’s expansion.
She said: “It is clear that the infrastructure has not kept pace with the level of growth, hence why one of my top priorities is to deliver new infrastructure, including the second railway station which has been promised for many decades but should now be complete by 2025/26 and a new junction at the Army and Navy.
“Large projects like this do take time to deliver but are vital for the city.”
City status supporters have long claimed economic benefits directly follow the administrative change.
The local authority in Brighton and Hove, who successfully obtained city status in the 2000 Millennium City Competition, even said tourism was given a “credible boost” as a result.
However, whether or not the Bond Street development or any other investment pumped into Chelmsford since 2012 is directly connected to its city status change remains to be seen.
Dr Steve Musson, a geography professor at the University of Reading, has attempted to study whether or not city status has really brought economic change.
In his study, which was titled ‘Great Expectations: What are the benefits of becoming a city?’, Dr Musson concluded: “Evidence for the economic importance of becoming a city is not very strong.
“Although Preston, Stirling and Inverness performed well in their first five years of existence, other places like Wolverhampton experienced relative decline.
He added: “By the time the winner of the 2012 Diamond Jubilee competition becomes a city, the benefits of putting a bid together will be assured.
“But any great expectations of an economic transformation seem less realistic.”
Christine Bhatt, who works as the director of policy at the Essex Chambers of Commerce, appeared to share some of Dr Musson’s reservations about city status bids.
She explained how it was unclear whether city status had directly led to some of the benefits, including during the 2012 Olympics when Chelmsford was said to have been “the gateway” to the games.
However, Ms Bhatt also pointed out how foreign investment has been a particular area of improvement since 2012.
“With Chelmsford gaining city status, this has enabled the education and business community to have ties with other countries like China, India, [and] the EU to ensure the continued flow of investment,” she said.
Ms Bhatt went on to claim that there had also been some negative developments in the last decade.
She said: “The plan for expanding the housing sector around the city has been met with a lot of criticism in that the right infrastructure is not in place with roads getting busier and creating traffic jams, which can last for hours sometimes.
“Sadly, with the COVID-19 pandemic, the high street has suffered a great deal with a number of shops closing down, the Meadows shopping centre looks like a ghost town.
“Homelessness is another major issue faced in the city centre with a growing number of homeless people sleeping in empty shop doorways, what can charities and local councils do to help them get out of this situation?
“There is also a growing drug problem which can make some visitors feel unsafe, again how can these issues be addressed in the very near future?
“I think there is an urgent need for local government, charities, education business establishments to get together and find ways to address these issues, naturally affecting the image of a city.”
Cllr Robinson has since explained what action Chelmsford City Council has already taken to counter these developments.
He said: “The traditional ‘high street’ was already changing pre-Covid.
“The shift to online shopping has just accelerated.
“In 2019, Chelmsford City Council was already looking at providing planning guidance to landlords about what might be acceptable changes of use if they want to move away from retail to something more productive.
“The City Council has secured considerable funding from developers and Government in recent to invest in reshaping the city centre and there is more to come.”
On homelessness and housing, he added: “Homelessness and housing problems are rising everywhere, unrelated to city status.
“However, the city council now offers accommodation and warp-around support to every rough sleeper found in Chelmsford and well over 70 have come off the streets in the last two years.
“The City Council has also recently purchased 20 houses for homeless families.”
COLCHESTER
The debate about whether city status really reaps financial rewards has also become a point of contention in nearby Colchester.
The market town, which is just 60 minutes away from London Liverpool Street, launched its fifth city status bid in 2021
However, locals do not seem to be totally behind the move.
According to an unscientific survey conducted on the Colchester Community Group Facebook page, an overwhelming majority of group members oppose Colchester obtaining city status.
A staggering 847 respondents voted against city status in the unscientific poll.
Just 180 Facebook users voted in favour.
Colcestrians took to the comment section to explain why there was so much opposition to their town’s city status bid.
The main gripe for opponents of city status stems from Colchester’s history.
Group members seemed to disagree as to whether Colchester was Britain’s first city or its first town.
“I am proud to live in Britain’s oldest recorded town, we don’t need to be classed as a city,” Sarah Cook explained.
Annelie Portteri responded: “I think it should be a city because it was one of the largest Roman cities.”
Michael Sewell, a PhD history student at the University of Essex, has weighed in on the ongoing debate about Colchester’s claim to be the country’s first city.
Mr Sewell explained: “Colchester’s claim to be the oldest city comes from its roots in Camulodunum and it has always been a rather prominent location during the Saxon and then Norman period.”
The market town has continued to play a significant role in British history, including in the 1648 Siege of Colchester.
However, the town then lost its royal charter due to corruption in the local corporation and all the power and courts were transferred down the road to Chelmsford.
“Colchester and Chelmsford have always for centuries fought over who was the county town and it has moved between the two,” Sewell said.
DON’T MISS: Roman mosaic discovered after dig in Colchester
The PhD student went on to claim Colchester should make more of its history in its city status bid.
He said: “The town has a rich and important history; I’m just not sure it has been deployed rightly.”
Sewell added: “I wouldn’t say history was a better argument but I do think, if used correctly alongside the economic benefit, then it would give the town an edge over Chelmsford.”
Despite Sewell’s comments, other users pointed to much more modern events to justify their opposition to Colchester’s city status bid.
Katrina Cooke claimed: “We do not look after our town enough to warrant city status.”
Another user added: “There are few draws to the town, most shops are shut down or could be found anywhere, the parking machines rarely work either.
“There are more potholes than roads and let’s not get started on having to know the tide times just to go through the Hythe.”
Conservative Councillor Darius Laws, portfolio holder for economy, business and heritage, has since responded to many of the concerns expressed by members of the Colchester Community Group.
He said: “We are Britain’s oldest recorded town and no one is seeking to take that away but we are looking to add the point that we were Britain’s first Roman city and therefore we should consider what city status in a modern context means and all the benefits that can come with that.”
But Cllr Laws also explained how city status could bring benefits to Colchester in 2022 and beyond.
“In a modern context,” he explained, “there are going to be tangible benefits because there are certain businesses that simply will not look at a town, they will only set up in a city.”
Mr Laws pointed to Pret A Manger as an example of a business that tends to focus on cities and does not have a store in Colchester.
In contrast, Chelmsford does have a Pret and is home to several stores associated with a rival coffee shop, leading the Sun to dub the county town as the Costa capital of the UK.
But the Rural Ward North Councillor also suggested the status change could see Colchester benefit from Brits seeking to get away on ‘city breaks’.
In response to concerns about Colchester’s infrastructure, Cllr Laws argued city status would enable Colcestrians to benefit from an increase in investment.
“By being a city, I think it makes it harder for Government to refuse us more capital infrastructure investment,” he claimed.
Mr Laws also conceded some of Colchester’s current infrastructure, including public transport, was not up to standard.
However, he warned opposing city status would not necessarily lead to the change local residents had been calling out for.
Laws explained: “None of that is going to change by us retaining our town status.”
A minority of users on the community Facebook page, including ex-Sunday Express journalist Roddy Ashworth, appeared to support Mr Laws’ plan to make Colchester a city.
Mr Ashworth argued: “Being a city would pull in valuable inward investment and give the council more power to attract businesses."
He added: “It would also give Colchester more clout in applying for grant funding and financing opportunities.
“And no, it wouldn't make it any easier for developers to build more houses here.
"Sadly that's going to happen in any case."
The controversial nature of Colchester’s city status proposal even prompted resident Phil Appleton to call on the council to hold a local referendum to decide whether to go ahead with the 2021 bid.
SOUTHEND-ON-SEA
However, even if Colchester succeeds with its fifth city status bid, it will become the third town in Essex to be granted city status.
Southend-on-Sea, a seaside resort located on the Thames Estuary, joined Chelmsford in becoming a city following the tragic death of one of its MPs.
Sir David Amess, who served as the MP for Southend West from 1997 to 2021, died aged 69 in a terror incident last October.
The Prince of Wales marked the moment Southend officially became England’s 52nd city by presenting the letters patent from the Queen in a visit with his wife the Duchess of Cornwall.
Camilla Parker-Bowles even tucked into fish and chips as she and Charles fulfilled the former Tory MP’s 21-year city status campaign.
READ MORE: Prince Charles gives Southend-on-Sea official city status
Speaking in Southend Borough Council’s chamber, the Prince of Wales said: “I recall with great fondness an occasion in January 2014 my wife and I visited the Palace Theatre in Westcliff-on-Sea.
“It was an enormously happy occasion and we were touched by the warmth from everyone we met.
“I knew Sir David as a renowned politician.
“Today, we mark the culmination of that dedicated campaign.”
During their visit, the Duke and Duchess of Cornwall also unveiled a new eco train on Southend Pier’s railway line which was named after Sir David Amess.
Residents and politicians across Southend-on-Sea now hope they will experience an economic boost in the area.
Southend-on-Sea Borough Council has previously said it is “striving” to create a ‘city-by-the-sea’ which will welcome visitors, stimulate start-up and growing businesses and help local residents fulfil their own potential.
James Duddridge, Tory MP for Rochford and Southend East, even went as far as to claim city status would bring tangible economic benefits to the area.
“A successful bid would turbo-charge our economy and bring new investment to our area – putting Southend firmly on the map, both across the country and around the world,” he said.
But the legacy of Sir David and his tragic death will remain an important part of Southend’s story going forward.
Speaking at the declaration in the recent Southend West by-election, Conservative candidate Anna Firth celebrated the legacy of her predecessor.
Ms Firth, who is originally from nearby Leigh-on-Sea, said: "Tonight, I pay tribute to Sir David Amess who represented this seat for more than 24 years and was a passionate advocate for Southend West.
"Sir David was a truly exceptional MP, he was a friend to all and he had a huge impact on everyone who lives here.
"To Sir David's family and friends, tonight will be a sad and painful day and I would like to tribute to Lady Amess and their children we are thinking of you tonight.
"I would also like to pay tribute to the political parties who marked their respect to Sir David by not contesting this by-election, it is inspiring to see politicians coming together from across the political divide to respect a great man and a great parliamentarian.
"It is the honour of my life to represent the people of Southend West and the place where I was born.
"As your Member of Parliament, I will work tirelessly to build on everything he achieved.”